I appreciate your POV, which is why I did not include that summary when I posted it to the communities. I only included it here in my journal. I realize that people being led from the communities would see it, but my feeling was that in my journal, where I talk about Wincest quite a bit and where I believe it's generally understood that I am in no way insulting or disparaging those who feel differently, it would be permissible to make tongue-in-cheek jokes on the subject - which I do quite frequently in other posts.

I also think the reverse situation is not the same, because while there is the incest aspect to Sam/Dean, there's also the gay aspect, and a reverse sort of tag could easily be read as a disparagement of queer readings of the text. It's not on equal footing.

That said, I absolutely did not intend to imply that there is anything unthinkable or problematic or otherwise negative about being squicked by Wincest, and I'm sorry that my post made you feel that way.