giandujakiss: (Default)
Makes what's coming after season 1 all the more painful.

(If you haven't seen at least season 1 of Gilmore Girls, and you care about complex stories involving relationships between women, you are totally missing out)
giandujakiss: (Default)
I have no idea what that was but I'm looking forward to next week.
giandujakiss: (Default)
Ummm ... that scene was perhaps a little too ... attractive ... for my comfort.

In other news, I am absolutely in complete love with - well, after seeing the episode, you'll know who. Give me all the fic please.
giandujakiss: (Default)
Wonder Woman first appeared during WWII - where's my Captain America meets Wonder Woman fanfic?
giandujakiss: (gay batman)
This weekend, Batman versus Superman opens. And I'd pretty much decided I was done with endless Batman and Superman recycles, and even though they're trying to lure me in by having Wonder Woman in a secondary role, I was not going to be fooled. My thinking has been, when I'm actually holding a advance ticket to see the Wonder Woman movie in my little hands, then I'll go back and watch the Batman versus Superman movie, as backstory.

That said, I might be willing to depart from this stance if I am reliably informed that Wonder Woman has a very large, awesome role in Batman versus Superman.

So y'all to report back and tell me what I should do.
giandujakiss: (Default)
How quickly I get my work done when I know I can read Captive Prince: Kings Rising once I've finished.
giandujakiss: (Default)
So I hadn't seen the Star Wars movie because I'm really not a Star Wars fan. But everyone was screaming about how awesome it is that a woman gets the Skywalker role, and that two non-white men are cast in supporting roles, and Leia's a general, etc, etc, and so I finally went.

And now, having seen the movie, yes, kudos to the casting and all, but ... there's a reason I'm not a Star Wars fan. I'm going to have to stand my ground on that one.

And as glad as I am that they're clearly setting up for sequels, and given the tremendous box office success I'd say sequels are a certainty, the cynical part of my brain thinks that the sequels will dial back Rey's role. The studio heads will dismiss the success of TFA despite the female lead as being due to the brand name of the franchise; they'll convince themselves that now that the novelty has worn off, boys will need a male hero to maintain interest, and also how are they supposed to sell toys with breasts on them? And Rey will be reduced to a supporting role in her own story.

giandujakiss: (Default)
Loved it. Was riveted.

I'm consistently amazed by movies (All The President's Men, its obvious forerunner; The Big Short) where everyone knows going in how the movie ends, but it still holds your attention because it's just such a great journey.

Anyway, at first I was afraid to watch Spotlight because I just didn't think I could take wallowing in the subject matter. But the movie is really more about reporting than the scandal itself. Don't get me wrong - the movie doesn't shy away from its subject - but it's the reporting that's in focus. What holds your attention is watching the reporters' growing amazement as they realize the extent of the problem - and the coverup.

Of course, after I saw Spotlight, Sister Act was on television, and man, talk about whiplash in terms of portrayals of the Catholic church.

Also saw Suffragette. Sadly, I found that very disappointing. A great example to prove the old adage, "If you want to send a message, use Western Union." The political polemic overshadows the storytelling, which is a pity, because if the movie had focused more on the story, the politics would have sold themselves - there's a lot of wonderful, heroic, tragic, horrifying history to mine. The movie is massively uninterested in portraying how anyone could have believed in this system, lived under it - which I dislike, because if there are any lessons to be learned from this kind of history, it has to be that people who thought themselves to be fair and good were able to justify this system to themselves. The lesson is how people in power convince themselves that the power is earned; and the distorting effects of that power on their behavior. And of course, that power doesn't give ground without a fight, no matter how justified the cause may seem in retrospect.

The movie tries to capture the idea of the suffragette movement through one woman's gradual conversion to the cause, except her conversion actually happens incredibly quickly; meanwhile, most of the other characters are more symbols than actual people. Lots of speeches by lots of characters, but I didn't get a real sense of where the movement was, its effect on the public, its relative popularity at the time. Critical things that might have had more of an emotional impact - the idea that politicians were keeping suffragette protests out of the press, for example, to keep them from making waves - were almost an afterthought. Compare, for example, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, which makes the suppression of press coverage into an incredibly powerful rallying point (I'm not suggesting Suffragette should have shown an army of children printing a newspaper; just that it's an easy outrage-button to push and they didn't push it). Frankly, this vid of the movie Iron Jawed Angels is more powerful than the entire Suffragette movie.


Dec. 27th, 2015 08:28 am
giandujakiss: (Default)
I'm going with the critical consensus. Jennifer Lawrence is a joy to watch, and there was a really great idea for a movie hiding in here, but sadly, there's too much other poorly conceptualized crap obscuring it. Because the tale that wants to be told is a straight up American dream sort of story - and that part's charming - but David O Russell couldn't leave it there; he wanted to make it also about some kind of dysfunctional family drama, and as a result, everything's kind of a mess.
giandujakiss: (Default)
loved it. It was extremely creative in the way that it jazzed up both the characters and the film style in order to turn an essentially unfilmable story into a surprisingly suspenseful film, considering we know how it ends.

It came up with some marvelously entertaining and original ways to explain the financial maneuvering behind the crisis, though I'm not certain how well they'd translate to someone who genuinely went in not knowing the basics.
giandujakiss: (Default)
I realize that many people dislike the male lead, because he's such a boring and traditional stoic man-painy kind of guy, but I see it differently.

As far as I'm concerned, the show is about Sif and the rest of the team. He's there to look pretty and make cow eyes at Sif and be just competent enough to seem Strong while simultaneously constantly finding himself in need of rescue (by Sif). He's an outline, a paper cut-out who exists to illustrate how desirable and awesome Sif is. He is, in short, a Strong Male Character.

And when I view him through that lens, I don't mind him at all. He pleases me.
giandujakiss: (Default)
The film [Steve Jobs] ultimately suggests that the deeply unpleasant behavior of people white men in the tech industry may be worth putting up with because of what they sometimes manage to create, often in spite of themselves.
-- Farhad Manjoo, Steve Jobs Review
giandujakiss: (Default)
Very brief thoughts from someone who has no familiarity with the original series -

Read more )

August 2017

  12 3 45
1314 1516171819


RSS Atom


Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 16th, 2017 05:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios