WSJ covers fanfic
Jun. 15th, 2012 11:00 amSigh.
It's not that I have a problem with the article (hilariously, the commenters seem to know more about the subject than the reporter does - re: Nero Wolfe, really????), it's just that I remember the exact same article when it appeared in the NYT 20 years ago.
It's not that I have a problem with the article (hilariously, the commenters seem to know more about the subject than the reporter does - re: Nero Wolfe, really????), it's just that I remember the exact same article when it appeared in the NYT 20 years ago.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 04:21 pm (UTC)I don't see anything in the article about Nero Wolfe? Or did you mean, really, is Nero Wolfe a Sherlock Holmes AU? Because, yes, sort of, in that Rex Stout *was* a giant Holmesian and *did* troll Holmesian fandom by posting meta that argued that close analysis of the stories revealed that Watson was a lady and Holmes' wife. :)
no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-06-16 12:47 am (UTC)The Wolfe novels are GREAT. I think Sarah's right, you can't really read them as Holmesian fanfic, even with the serial numbers filed off-- Wolfe and Archie are too distinct. But the books are definitely fangirl catnip, in that you can absolutely tell the author definitely loves the SH stories for the same reasons we fangirl Holmesians do, and has thought A LOT about how cool it would be for a cranky genius detective & his badass sidekick to live together and solve crimes, etc.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 05:57 pm (UTC)Why hello there, bias!
As if that was not true of everything.
no subject
Date: 2012-06-15 06:09 pm (UTC)