...according to - some guy on the internet.
And - look, see, these kinds of stories I generally find funny, and no, I don't particularly care when people make fun of SPN fans or even when they make fun of Wincest, and no, I don't take this kind of thing very seriously. It's just - there's a tone here that kind of perfectly captures the problem when people outside fandom (and that often, though not always, means men) look at fandom activities (activities that are often, though not always, favored by women) and express revulsion, and it gets to the heart of why fandom is (to me) a political project as well as a fun pastime:
One might almost call it ... Kripke-esque.
So, you know - support the OTW!
And - look, see, these kinds of stories I generally find funny, and no, I don't particularly care when people make fun of SPN fans or even when they make fun of Wincest, and no, I don't take this kind of thing very seriously. It's just - there's a tone here that kind of perfectly captures the problem when people outside fandom (and that often, though not always, means men) look at fandom activities (activities that are often, though not always, favored by women) and express revulsion, and it gets to the heart of why fandom is (to me) a political project as well as a fun pastime:
Listen, I love Supernatural, I really do. But some fans out there really love Supernatural, to almost clinical levels. Ahem: The show's weirdest fans are known for writing tales about a little something called "Wincest," a play on the main characters' surname (they're known as the Winchester brothers) and that taboo where siblings get it on. And as much as I enjoy watching Sam and Dean Winchester battle demons, I do not have any inclination to see them (or read about them) having sex with each other.Now ... I'm not quite sure what he's talking about with the crab claw thing, but that aside - note the phrasing here. "I do not have any inclination to see them having sex with each other" and "Nor do I care to read about what the angel Castiel does with Dean." With an apparent total lack of self-awareness, he's explicitly gauging Sam/Dean and Dean/Castiel only by reference to what he personally wants to read. If he's interested, thumbs up; if he's not, it's crazycakes, and that's his sole criterion.
Proof: Nor do I care to read about what the angel Castiel, with a crab claw for a hand, does with Dean.
One might almost call it ... Kripke-esque.
So, you know - support the OTW!
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:13 am (UTC)I like to think I'm pretty laid back about fandom getting teased but maybe I'm not as laid back as I'd like because the tone of that article annoyed me really fast. It has the underlying implication that there is a Right Way and a Wrong Way to be a fan and doing any fic, art, vidding is very much the Wrong Way. That tone is part of the inherent gender division of in discourses about fandom where male fans are goofy geeks (look, they talk about continuities!) but female fans are just sexually into the object of their fannishness - they don't want to be Batman, they just want to be with Batman.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:15 am (UTC)Yes, exactly. And I don't care what Some Guy on the Internet thinks, it's just that his view is also reflected in, say, actual people with power - like the people who actually work in Hollywood and make the television shows. Because that tone is exactly the tone that you can hear/see in Kripke's "meta" episodes and in the male fan/female fan divide in The Real Ghostbusters.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:24 am (UTC)Plus, this whole attitude towards fans - and female fans in particular - is part of the reason we are so worried about being "outted" and don't even get me started on being a female fan in a comics store...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:30 am (UTC)And I certainly hear you on the outing - I'm not exactly forthcoming with my own personal details :-).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:37 am (UTC)Edit: Sorry, didn't mean to go on a rant there.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 04:44 am (UTC)I still maintain that we are as strong as our weakest members, i.e., if I have to defend the crappiest tackiest canon fic on ffnet or the squickiest whatnot. It's ALL fandom. Not just the nice and presentable; not just the artistic and cool. All of it! /steps off soapbox...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 05:04 am (UTC)But you don't go defending "your" type of fan expression against those bad or yucky ones.
I always feel like they're saving their ass and hanging the rest out to dry...I may not like it but I defend it. I think that's the bottom line (and yes, it's harder to defend what you DON'T like!)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 07:13 am (UTC)Yes, ugh.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 07:03 pm (UTC)