See, the thing I disagree with about
Sep. 27th, 2009 07:00 amthis post - which seems to be causing some degree of consternation and/or soul-searching on my FList - is that it doesn't really distinguish between bad trope and bad writing.
I happen to love exactly these kind of whumpage stories and I refuse to apologize for it no matter how juvenile the fantasy - and yes, I agree, it's a juvenile fantasy. But it's a very popular one that runs through a ton of fics, including many excellent ones. The difference between the good fics and the bad fics isn't the trope but the writing. I mean, aside from basic construction issues like grammar, etc, a good whumpage fic along these lines manages to dial it back a bit, add some plot, give the hero the occasional thing to think about besides his own misery, gives the hero some agency instead of having him be an entirely passive victim, gives characterizations to the victimizers so they aren't just randomly or irrationally evil, etc. A bad whumpage fic - and even those can still hit the id the right way, depending - is much more over the top.
Which isn't to say that these are to everyone's taste - clearly, they aren't, IDIC, etc. But I feel as though the OP is describing badfic even as she identifies a trope, and at least some of the commenters are doing the same.
So, for example, a really excellent story that's very well-written and very popular in SPN fandom is
leonidaslion's The Light of Munin. It's classic whumpage, with exactly the tropes the OP describes, but it's also a wonderful story. And Lanning Cook's deeply wonderful Highlander story, Sacred Trust, also follows the same trope pretty closely - and it's brilliant.
I happen to love exactly these kind of whumpage stories and I refuse to apologize for it no matter how juvenile the fantasy - and yes, I agree, it's a juvenile fantasy. But it's a very popular one that runs through a ton of fics, including many excellent ones. The difference between the good fics and the bad fics isn't the trope but the writing. I mean, aside from basic construction issues like grammar, etc, a good whumpage fic along these lines manages to dial it back a bit, add some plot, give the hero the occasional thing to think about besides his own misery, gives the hero some agency instead of having him be an entirely passive victim, gives characterizations to the victimizers so they aren't just randomly or irrationally evil, etc. A bad whumpage fic - and even those can still hit the id the right way, depending - is much more over the top.
Which isn't to say that these are to everyone's taste - clearly, they aren't, IDIC, etc. But I feel as though the OP is describing badfic even as she identifies a trope, and at least some of the commenters are doing the same.
So, for example, a really excellent story that's very well-written and very popular in SPN fandom is